Instead, in argument within their a reaction to the movement to remand, defendants provide a dysfunction of some of the expenses of shutting down the mortgage system (totaling $868,000).

Instead, in argument within their a reaction to the movement to remand, defendants provide a dysfunction of some of the expenses of shutting down the mortgage system (totaling $868,000).

Neither is defendants’ conclusory statement within the notice of elimination that the expense of injunctive relief would go beyond $75,000 adequate.

See Honeycutt v. Dillard’s, Inc., 989 F. Supp. 1375, 1377 (D.Kan.1997). Defendants would not provide any underlying facts, numbers or calculations supporting this declaration. The undersigned has not yet considered this belated “economic analysis” since it is perhaps maybe maybe maybe not into the elimination notice or submitted by way of *1201 connected affidavit thereto. 6 See Laughlin, 50 F.3d at 873; Martin, 251 F.3d at 1291 letter. 4; Coca-Cola Bottling of Emporia, Inc. 继续阅读“Instead, in argument within their a reaction to the movement to remand, defendants provide a dysfunction of some of the expenses of shutting down the mortgage system (totaling $868,000).”